Scenario

Hamwi vs Devine Ideal Weight Formula

Compare the Hamwi (1964) and Devine (1974) ideal body weight formulas. Understand why they differ, their respective clinical uses, and which to choose for drug dosing vs nutritional assessment.

Interactive Calculator

Your Details

cm

Formula Comparison Results

Devine (1974)

Primary
70.5kg

Hamwi (1964)

72kg

Robinson (1983)

68.9kg

Miller (1985)

68.7kg

Formula Results Comparison

Result Range

63.7 kg77 kg
Devine
Hamwi
Robinson
Miller

Key Insight

For a male at 175 cm with medium frame, the four formulas give results from 68.7 kg to 72 kg. Devine (1974) is the most commonly referenced in medical literature, while the newer formulas (Robinson, Miller) tend to give more conservative estimates. These are reference ranges, not targets — individual healthy weights vary based on muscle mass, bone density, and body composition.

Scenario guide

Scenario guide

The Hamwi formula: the first gender-specific IBW equation

Published by George J. Hamwi in 1964, this formula was the first to provide distinct ideal body weight calculations for men and women, which was significant for its time. For men: 48 kg (106 lb) for the first 5 feet + 2.7 kg (5 lb) for each additional inch. For women: 45.5 kg (100 lb) for the first 5 feet + 2.2 kg (4.5 lb) for each additional inch. Hamwi was designed primarily for clinical nutrition settings to assess whether a patient was underweight, at a healthy weight, or overweight. The formula uses smaller per-inch increments than Devine for women, producing a more conservative IBW estimate. For a 5'8" woman, Hamwi yields 54.6 kg (120.4 lb), while Devine yields 56.4 kg (124.4 lb).

The Devine formula: the clinical drug-dosing standard

Published by B.J. Devine in 1974, this formula quickly became the standard for estimating ideal body weight in pharmacology and clinical medicine. For men: 50 kg (106 lb) for the first 5 feet + 2.3 kg (6 lb) for each additional inch. For women: 45.5 kg (100 lb) for the first 5 feet + 2.3 kg (5 lb) for each additional inch. Devine uses larger per-inch increments for men (6 lb vs 5 lb) and equal per-inch increments for both genders (5 lb per inch for women, matching Hamwi's base). The formula is used extensively in calculating doses for drugs with narrow therapeutic windows, including aminoglycosides, theophylline, and various chemotherapy agents, where dosing based on actual body weight can lead to toxicity.

Why do Hamwi and Devine give different results?

The two formulas differ in three key parameters: (1) the base weight for men — Hamwi uses 48 kg while Devine uses 50 kg, a 2 kg (4.4 lb) difference; (2) the per-inch increment for men — Hamwi uses 2.7 kg (5 lb) while Devine uses 2.3 kg (6 lb), meaning Devine adds more weight per inch of height; (3) the per-inch increment for women — both use similar values but Devine rounds to 5 lb per inch while Hamwi uses 4.5 lb per inch. For a 5'10" man: Hamwi = 71.6 kg vs Devine = 73.8 kg, a 2.2 kg (4.8 lb) difference. The higher Devine value reflects its pharmacological purpose: slightly higher IBW estimates are safer for drug dosing because underdosing is generally less dangerous than overdosing.

Clinical applications: when each formula is preferred

Use Devine when: calculating drug doses (especially aminoglycosides, vancomycin, theophylline); setting ventilator tidal volumes in critical care; estimating nutritional requirements in hospital settings. Devine is embedded in most clinical drug-dosing calculators and electronic health record systems. Use Hamwi when: assessing nutritional status in outpatient dietetics; setting caloric targets for weight management programs; providing a more conservative IBW estimate for general health assessments. Some dietitians prefer Hamwi for its lower weight targets, which may be more appropriate for weight management counseling in overweight populations.

Practical comparison examples

  • 5'6" man: Hamwi = 63.4 kg (139.8 lb), Devine = 65.1 kg (143.4 lb) — Devine is 1.7 kg (3.6 lb) higher
  • 5'10" man: Hamwi = 71.6 kg (157.8 lb), Devine = 73.8 kg (162.6 lb) — Devine is 2.2 kg (4.8 lb) higher
  • 5'4" woman: Hamwi = 52.0 kg (114.7 lb), Devine = 52.0 kg (114.7 lb) — essentially identical at this height
  • 5'8" woman: Hamwi = 54.6 kg (120.4 lb), Devine = 56.4 kg (124.4 lb) — Devine is 1.8 kg (4.0 lb) higher
  • 6'0" man: Hamwi = 76.9 kg (169.5 lb), Devine = 78.6 kg (173.4 lb) — Devine is 1.7 kg (3.9 lb) higher
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Hamwi and Devine formulas?
Devine uses higher base weights and larger per-inch increments than Hamwi, producing IBW values that are typically 2–5 lb higher for the same height and gender. Devine was designed for drug dosing; Hamwi for nutritional assessment.
Which formula should I use for drug dosing?
Use the Devine formula. It is the clinical standard in pharmacology and is embedded in most hospital drug-dosing calculators and electronic health records.
Are the formulas the same for men and women?
No. Both formulas have separate equations for men and women, reflecting biological differences in body composition. Men start with a higher base weight (106 lb for both formulas), and the per-inch increments differ by formula and sometimes by gender.
Which formula gives a lower ideal weight target?
Hamwi generally gives lower IBW values than Devine, particularly for men above 5'6". This makes Hamwi more conservative and sometimes preferred in weight management contexts.
Can these formulas be used for athletes or very muscular people?
No. All IBW formulas estimate lean mass based on height alone and cannot account for above-average muscle mass. Athletes and bodybuilders will always appear significantly above their IBW, regardless of which formula is used.
Keep going