Calculator

Free BSA Calculator — Body Surface Area by 3 Formulas

Calculate your body surface area (BSA) using three validated formulas: Du Bois, Mosteller, and Haycock. BSA is used in medical dosing and physiological assessments.

Calculator

Your Details

cm
kg

Your BSA Results

Du Bois (1916)

Original formula

1.85m²

Mosteller (1987)

Most common

1.84m²

Haycock (1978)

Pediatric use

1.85m²
Average BSA
1.85m²
Average of all three formulas

BSA on Reference Scale

Formula Comparison

BSA Reference Range: Average BSA is approximately 1.7 m² for men and 1.6 m² for women. Your average BSA of 1.85 m² is above average, which is common for taller or larger-framed individuals.

The formula

How it’s calculated

What BSA Measures

Body Surface Area (BSA) is a measurement of the total external surface area of the human body, expressed in square meters (m²). Unlike BMI, which assesses weight relative to height, BSA estimates the physical extent of the body surface — a metric that correlates closely with metabolic rate, blood volume, and cardiac output.

BSA is most commonly used in clinical medicine to calculate chemotherapy dosages, determine medication doses for drugs with narrow therapeutic windows, and normalize physiological indices such as cardiac index and glomerular filtration rate. Because BSA-based dosing scales drug delivery to a patient's size more precisely than weight alone, it is the standard of care in oncology and several other specialties.

The BSA Formulas

Three validated formulas are provided in this calculator. Each was derived from measurements of different populations, and while they produce similar results for most adults, minor differences are expected. The most widely used formula in current clinical practice is the Mosteller formula, valued for its simplicity.

Du Bois (1916)
BSA = 0.007184 × W0.425 × H0.725
Mosteller (1987)
BSA = √(W × H ÷ 3600)
Haycock (1978)
BSA = 0.024265 × W0.5378 × H0.3964
Where W = weight in kilograms, H = height in centimeters

Formula Source

Du Bois & Du Bois (1916) — A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Archives of Internal Medicine, 17, 863–871.

Reference URL: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1916.00080130008002

Mosteller (1987) — Simplified calculation of body-surface area. New England Journal of Medicine, 317(17), 1098.

Reference URL: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198707233170417

Haycock et al. (1978) — Geometric method for measuring body surface area: A height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. The Journal of Pediatrics, 93(1), 62–66.

Last Verified: 2026-08-09

Worked Example

Consider an adult who weighs 70 kg and stands 175 cm tall. Applying each formula side by side:

Du Bois: 0.007184 × 700.425 × 1750.725 = 0.007184 × 6.08 × 42.29 ≈ 1.85 m²

Mosteller: √(70 × 175 ÷ 3600) = √(12,250 ÷ 3600) = √3.403 ≈ 1.84 m²

Haycock: 0.024265 × 700.5378 × 1750.3964 = 0.024265 × 9.82 × 7.75 ≈ 1.85 m²

All three formulas converge near 1.85 m² for this individual, which is a typical adult BSA value. The small variation between formulas (within 0.01 m² in this case) is clinically acceptable for most applications.

BSA Formula Comparison Table

FormulaEquationTypical Use Case
Du Bois (1916)0.007184 × W0.425 × H0.725Original reference standard; widely cited in research and historical clinical data.
Mosteller (1987)√(W × H ÷ 3600)Most commonly used in modern clinical practice due to its simplicity and strong agreement with the Du Bois formula.
Haycock (1978)0.024265 × W0.5378 × H0.3964Often preferred for pediatric and neonatal populations; validated across a wider age range including infants.

Why BSA Alone Is Not a Full Picture

BSA is a powerful clinical tool, but it is not a standalone health assessment. A single BSA value does not reveal whether a person is underweight, overweight, or has a healthy body composition. Two individuals with identical BSA can have very different ratios of muscle to fat, different metabolic rates, and different overall health profiles.

BSA is most useful when applied as part of a broader clinical context — for example, when calculating a chemotherapy dose, the clinician also considers organ function, performance status, and prior treatment response. For general wellness tracking, BSA is less informative than BMI, waist circumference, or body composition measurements.

Known Limitations

  • BSA formulas are population-derived estimates, not direct measurements. Actual surface area varies with body shape, posture, and individual anatomy.
  • The Du Bois formula was derived from only nine subjects, which limits its statistical generalizability across diverse populations.
  • BSA formulas may be less accurate at extremes of height and weight (very tall, very short, underweight, or severely obese individuals).
  • BSA does not account for body composition — two people with the same BSA can have very different fat-to-muscle ratios.
  • BSA is not a fitness metric. It was designed for medical dosing and physiological normalization, not for tracking weight or health status over time.
Health guide

Reading your results, kindly

Interpreting Your BSA Result

BSA is primarily a clinical measurement rather than a wellness or fitness metric. The average adult BSA is approximately 1.7 m² for men and 1.6 m² for women, though these values vary naturally with height, weight, and frame size. Values between 1.5 m² and 2.0 m² cover the majority of adults.

If you are using BSA in a medical context — such as discussing a drug dosage or cardiac index with your provider — the specific formula matters less than consistency. Your clinician will typically use the same formula each time to ensure comparable results over successive visits. The Mosteller formula is the most common choice in hospitals and clinics today.

Pay attention to which formula your care team uses. If you are tracking BSA as part of a treatment plan, use the same formula consistently to avoid confusing formula-related differences with actual changes in your body size.

General Lifestyle Guidance for Sustainable Wellness

BSA itself is not a target for lifestyle modification, but the habits that support a healthy body size and composition are the same regardless of your BSA value. The following principles are widely supported by health science for maintaining overall wellness.

Nutrition Habits

  • Build meals around whole, minimally processed foods: vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, nuts, seeds, eggs, fish, and lean protein sources. These provide the nutrients your body needs without excess calories.
  • Prioritize protein at every meal to support muscle retention and metabolic health. A practical baseline is roughly 1.2 to 1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight daily for most adults.
  • Include a variety of colorful vegetables and fruits to ensure adequate micronutrient and fiber intake. Fiber supports digestion, blood sugar regulation, and long-term satiety.
  • Stay adequately hydrated. Water, herbal tea, and plain coffee or tea without added sugar all count toward daily fluid intake.
  • Limit added sugars and ultra-processed snacks, which can disrupt energy balance and metabolic health over time.

Movement and Activity

  • Aim for at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic movement per week: brisk walking, cycling, swimming, or dancing all qualify. Consistency matters more than intensity.
  • Add two sessions of strength training per week using bodyweight, dumbbells, resistance bands, or machines. Muscle is metabolically active tissue and supports long-term health.
  • Reduce sedentary time. Stand, stretch, or walk for two minutes every hour if your work is desk-based. Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) contributes meaningfully to total daily energy expenditure.
  • Pick activities you genuinely enjoy. Sustainable movement habits are built on enjoyment, not obligation.

Sleep and Stress

  • Sleep 7 to 9 hours per night on a consistent schedule. Chronic sleep disruption alters hunger hormones (ghrelin and leptin) and can negatively affect metabolic regulation.
  • Manage stress with daily practices you find calming: deep breathing, journaling, time in nature, gentle stretching, or social connection. Chronic stress elevates cortisol levels, which can influence appetite and body composition.

When To Seek a Qualified Provider

BSA is a medical measurement, and its primary use case is clinical decision-making. Consider speaking with a healthcare professional if any of the following apply: you are scheduled for a treatment that requires BSA-based dosing (such as chemotherapy) and want to understand how your dose is calculated; you have experienced a significant, unexplained change in your body size that affects your BSA; you are managing a condition that requires regular physiological monitoring (such as cardiac or renal disease); or you simply want a professional assessment of your overall health in the context of your body measurements.

Tracking Tips

For most people, BSA is not a metric that needs regular tracking. It changes only when your weight or height changes meaningfully. If you do need to track BSA over time — for example, during a treatment course — use the same formula each time, measure your weight under consistent conditions (same time of day, similar clothing), and have your height measured professionally rather than relying on self-report.

More useful for day-to-day wellness tracking are complementary metrics: weight trend (using weekly averages), waist circumference, how your clothes fit, energy levels, sleep quality, and exercise performance. These markers provide actionable feedback that BSA alone cannot offer.

Common Myths About BSA

Myth 1: A higher BSA always means a larger body. Not exactly. BSA increases with both height and weight, so a tall, lean person can have a similar BSA to a shorter, heavier person. BSA reflects the combination of these two dimensions, not body size or composition in isolation.

Myth 2: BSA and BMI measure the same thing. No. BSA measures body surface area (m²) and is used for medical dosing and physiological normalization. BMI measures weight relative to height (kg/m²) and is used for population-level weight classification. They are different metrics designed for different purposes.

Myth 3: The Mosteller formula is always the most accurate. The Mosteller formula is the most convenient and widely used, but accuracy depends on the population. The Du Bois formula is the original reference standard, and the Haycock formula may be preferred for children and infants. All three are validated and produce clinically similar results for most adults.

Myth 4: BSA can tell you your body fat percentage. No. BSA is a measure of surface area, not composition. Two people with the same BSA can have very different fat-to- muscle ratios. BSA alone provides no information about body fat, muscle mass, or bone density.

Myth 5: You should aim for a specific BSA target. There is no ideal BSA target for health. Unlike BMI, which has established population-level risk categories, BSA does not have healthy or unhealthy ranges. It is a descriptive measurement used in medical calculations, not a wellness benchmark.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What is body surface area used for?
BSA is primarily used in medical dosing for chemotherapy drugs, determining cardiac output and renal function indices, and assessing burn severity. It is a standard clinical measurement.
What is a normal BSA?
Average BSA is approximately 1.7 m² for men and 1.6 m² for women. Normal ranges vary by height and weight. Values typically range from 1.5 to 2.0 m² for most adults.
Which BSA formula is most accurate?
The Mosteller formula is most commonly used in clinical practice due to its simplicity. The Du Bois formula is the original reference standard. All three formulas are validated and provide similar results for most adults.
Is BSA the same as BMI?
No. BSA measures the surface area of the body (in m²), while BMI measures weight relative to height (kg/m²). They are used for different purposes — BSA for medical dosing, BMI for weight classification.
Can BSA be used for fitness tracking?
BSA is not primarily a fitness metric. It is a medical measurement. However, it can be used in some physiological calculations like basal metabolic rate approximations.
Does age affect BSA?
BSA changes with growth during childhood and adolescence. In adults, BSA is relatively stable. It may decrease slightly with age due to height loss from spinal compression.
Why do different formulas give different results?
Each formula was developed using different populations and measurement techniques. The differences are usually small (within 5-10%) for most adults. The Mosteller formula gives intermediate values.
Keep going
Scenario guides

Explore scenarios