Scenario

BMR Calculator by Age — How Metabolism Changes Over Time

BMR calculator by age. See why resting metabolism declines about 1 to 2 percent per decade, the age-related BMR comparison, and how strength training slows the drop.

Interactive Calculator

Your Details

years
cm
kg

Your Basal Metabolic Rate

Mifflin-St Jeor (1990)

Recommended
1649kcal/day

Harris-Benedict (Revised 1984)

Classic
1696kcal/day

Why Two Formulas?

The Mifflin-St Jeor equation (1990) is generally considered the more accurate of the two for most modern adult populations, with typical error of about ±5–10%. The revised Harris-Benedict (1984) is an older standard still widely referenced in historical literature. Both formulas agree to within about 3–5% for most adults. Use Mifflin as your default and Harris-Benedict as a cross-check.

The Formulas

Mifflin-St Jeor
BMR = 10w + 6.25h − 5a + 5
Harris-Benedict (Revised)
BMR = 88.362 + 13.397w + 4.799h − 5.677a
w = weight in kg · h = height in cm · a = age in years

Next step: Calculate Your Daily Calorie Needs

At a moderate activity level (3–5 days of exercise per week), your estimated total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) is 2,556 kcal/day. Refine with your actual activity level in the TDEE calculator.

Open TDEE Calculator →
The formula

The formula

What BMR Measures

Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) is an estimate of how many calories your body would burn in a 24-hour period if you stayed completely at rest — awake, lying still, comfortable room temperature, in a post-absorptive state (not digesting a recent meal). BMR represents the energy cost of keeping all your vital systems running: the heart, lungs, brain, liver, kidneys, and every other organ and tissue performing the thousands of chemical reactions required simply to stay alive.

BMR is the single biggest component of total daily energy expenditure for most adults, typically accounting for 60 to 75 percent of total calories burned each day. The rest comes from non-exercise activity thermogenesis, purposeful exercise, and the thermic effect of food. Knowing your BMR helps you design realistic calorie targets for weight change, maintenance, or athletic performance fueling.

The Two BMR Formulas

This calculator presents two of the most widely used BMR estimation formulas side by side so you can compare. Neither is perfect — both estimate within a typical population error band of about ±5 to 10 percent for individuals where no measured metabolic data is available.

1. Mifflin-St Jeor Equation (Published 1990)

Male: BMR = 10w + 6.25h − 5a + 5
Female: BMR = 10w + 6.25h − 5a − 161
w = weight in kgh = height in cma = age in years

The Mifflin-St Jeor equation was published in 1990 by Mifflin et al. at Oregon State University after reviewing 114 studies and validating against a large sample of measured indirect calorimetry results. Multiple independent reviews, including a 2005 analysis in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, have concluded Mifflin-St Jeor is generally the most accurate population-level formula for most modern adults.

2. Harris-Benedict Equation (Revised 1984 by Roza & Shizgal)

Male: BMR = 88.362 + (13.397 × w) + (4.799 × h) − (5.677 × a)
Female: BMR = 447.593 + (9.247 × w) + (3.098 × h) − (4.330 × a)
w = weight in kgh = height in cma = age in years

The original Harris-Benedict equation dates to 1918-1919, developed by James Arthur Harris and Francis Gano Benedict using calorimetry data from 239 men and women. A 1984 revision by Roza and Shizgal updated the constants using more modern measurement techniques on a larger sample. The revised Harris-Benedict formula remains common in many evidence-based and older software systems, though it typically produces results slightly different from Mifflin-St Jeor depending on age and body size.

Formula Source

This calculator uses the **Mifflin-St Jeor equation for resting energy expenditure** from **Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST et al., American Journal of Clinical Nutrition** published in **1990**.

Reference URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/51.2.241

Last Verified: 2026-07-30

Worked Example

For a 30-year-old male, 175 cm, 70 kg. Mifflin-St Jeor: (10 × 70) + (6.25 × 175) − (5 × 30) + 5 = 700 + 1093.75 − 150 + 5 = 1648.75 kcal/day ≈ 1649 kcal/day. Revised Harris-Benedict: 88.362 + (13.397 × 70) + (4.799 × 175) − (5.677 × 30) = 88.362 + 937.79 + 839.825 − 170.31 ≈ 1696 kcal/day. The two formulas give answers about 47 kcal apart for this example — a difference of roughly 3 percent.

FAQ-Style Explanations

Why are the two formulas different? They were derived on different populations at different times using different measurement equipment. Harris-Benedict was developed on a small, mostly European-origin sample in the early 1900s. Mifflin-St Jeor was developed in 1990 using a larger and more diverse sample. The differences reflect the underlying data more than any deep disagreement about human metabolism.

Which one should I use? For most adults, use the Mifflin-St Jeor number as your primary estimate. If you already know from experience how many calories you need to maintain your current weight, compare it to both formulas and pick whichever is closer to your personal reality. If you are very muscular, very elderly, or have a medical condition affecting metabolism, both formulas will be less accurate and a measured resting metabolic rate test would give you a better answer.

Does BMR decrease with age? Yes, on average. After roughly age 20, BMR declines approximately 2 to 3 percent per decade in most people. This decline is largely driven by sarcopenia — the gradual loss of muscle mass that occurs with aging when strength training is not maintained. Regular resistance training and adequate protein intake can slow this decline substantially and preserve metabolic rate into older age.

Known Limitations

  • Estimates only. Real resting metabolic rate can only be measured directly via indirect calorimetry or a doubly labeled water study.
  • Do not account for body composition. Two people with identical height, weight, age, and sex can have very different BMR if one has much more muscle than the other.
  • Do not account for thyroid function, regular health products, fever, pregnancy, lactation, or metabolic conditions.
  • Less accurate at the extremes of body size (very high or very low BMI) and for people of non-European ethnic backgrounds where the original validation samples were thin.
  • BMR is not a target to eat at — it is the minimum. Almost everyone needs significantly more calories than BMR in daily life.
Scenario guide

Scenario guide

Why BMR Declines With Age

Basal Metabolic Rate tends to fall by roughly 1 to 2 percent per decade from early adulthood onward, but age itself is only part of the story. The decline is driven mainly by two forces working together: the gradual loss of skeletal muscle (sarcopenia) and shifting hormone levels. Because the Mifflin-St Jeor formula includes an explicit age term that subtracts 5 calories per year of age, the calculated BMR drops automatically as you get older. But the larger, slower effect comes from losing metabolically active lean mass — muscle burns more calories at rest than fat, so as muscle fades, resting metabolism fades with it. The good news is that the muscle-loss portion of this decline is largely preventable with resistance training, which is why active older adults often maintain BMR far above the typical curve.

BMR Across the Decades

The table below shows approximate BMR for a 175 cm (5 ft 9 in) adult of average build at different ages, using the Mifflin-St Jeor formula. These are illustrative reference points, not predictions for any individual — actual BMR depends heavily on weight, lean mass, and activity history. Notice how the age term and the assumed gradual weight and muscle shifts combine to lower BMR over time, and how resistance training can keep an active adult well above the sedentary curve at the same age.

AgeApprox. Male BMRApprox. Female BMR
25~1,780 kcal~1,480 kcal
35~1,730 kcal~1,430 kcal
45~1,680 kcal~1,380 kcal
55~1,630 kcal~1,330 kcal
65~1,580 kcal~1,280 kcal

Reference values for a 175 cm adult at 75 kg (male) and 65 kg (female); actual values vary with weight, lean mass, and activity.

Muscle Loss and Hormone Changes

Sarcopenia — the gradual loss of skeletal muscle — begins as early as the 30s and accelerates after 60 in people who do not train. Since muscle is the most metabolically active tissue at rest, losing it directly lowers BMR. Hormone shifts compound the effect: declining testosterone in men and shifting estrogen around menopause in women both contribute to a reduction in lean mass and a redistribution of fat. The age term in the Mifflin-St Jeor formula captures part of this statistically, but the real-world driver is body composition. Two 55-year-olds of the same weight can have very different BMRs depending on how much muscle each carries.

Slowing the Decline With Strength Training

  • Resistance training two to four times per week is the most effective way to preserve and build muscle, which is the largest controllable factor in BMR.
  • Adequate protein — 1.2 to 1.6 grams per kilogram of body weight, rising for those who train — supports lean mass and the thermic effect of food.
  • Stay active throughout the day. Steps and light movement add to total expenditure and help maintain muscle.
  • Prioritize sleep and avoid extreme diets, both of which protect resting metabolism from the adaptation that lowers BMR over time.
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does BMR decrease with age?
Basal Metabolic Rate tends to fall by roughly 1 to 2 percent per decade from early adulthood onward, though the exact rate varies widely between individuals. The decline comes from two forces working together: the gradual loss of skeletal muscle (sarcopenia) and shifting hormone levels. The Mifflin-St Jeor formula also includes an explicit age term that subtracts 5 calories per year. Importantly, the muscle-loss portion of this decline is largely preventable with resistance training, which is why active older adults often maintain BMR far above the typical sedentary curve at the same age.
At what age does metabolism start to slow down?
The gradual decline in BMR begins as early as the 30s, driven mainly by the slow loss of skeletal muscle that starts in early adulthood, and accelerates after 60 in people who do not train. Hormone shifts — including declining testosterone in men and shifting estrogen around menopause in women — contribute as well. Because the decline is driven largely by body composition rather than age alone, two people of the same age can have very different BMRs depending on how much muscle each carries and how active they are.
Can I stop my BMR from dropping as I age?
You can slow the decline substantially, though not halt it entirely. The most effective lever is resistance training two to four times per week, which preserves and builds the skeletal muscle that is the largest controllable factor in BMR. Adequate protein — 1.2 to 1.6 grams per kilogram of body weight, rising for those who train — supports that lean mass. Staying active throughout the day, prioritizing sleep, and avoiding extreme diets also protect resting metabolism from the adaptation that lowers BMR. Active older adults often maintain BMR well above the typical sedentary curve.
Why do older adults need fewer calories?
Older adults typically need fewer calories because BMR falls with age — driven by muscle loss and hormone shifts — and because total daily activity often decreases as well. Lower lean mass means less metabolically active tissue burning calories at rest, so both BMR and TDEE trend downward. However, this is not inevitable: older adults who resistance train and stay active maintain more muscle and a higher BMR than sedentary peers of the same age. Protein intake also becomes more important with age to protect lean mass.
Does the BMR formula account for age directly?
Yes. The Mifflin-St Jeor formula includes an explicit age term that subtracts 5 calories per year of age, so the calculated BMR drops automatically as you get older, independent of any change in weight or height. For men this appears as minus 5 times age within a formula that otherwise rewards weight and height; for women the structure is identical. However, the larger real-world driver of the age-related decline is body composition — specifically the loss of muscle — so two people of the same age, weight, and height can still have different actual metabolisms depending on lean mass.
Keep going